|
5.
Case History
3.
Certainly all the decision-making was difficult, taking large amounts
of time and consuming many peoples energies. Part of this was due
to the newness of the medium and our collective lack of Web experience,
but also because of our ambitiousness. Rather than publish the conventional
photographs of war we were attempting to understand how peoples viciously
killing each other for years arrive at peace, and provide forums to discuss
strategies of resolution; rather than circumvent the photographer freshly
back from extraordinarily intense experiences and highly invested in his
own work we gave him center stage; rather than produce the site primarily
relying on the authority of the New York Times we were, by creating a
dialectic among photographer, subject and reader, seeming to almost undermine
it. Computers were set up at the Hague where a war crimes trial was beginning,
at the United Nations, and through the Soros Foundation in Sarajevo so
that non-Times subscribers could more easily participate (the Times sent
out 200,000 e-mail messages to its subscribers announcing the site, and
made it free to anyone with Internet access who wanted to enter).
1
Certain of our desires for the project were not accomplished. We were
enchanted for a while with the idea of keeping track of a readers
movements so that more mixing of pathways could occur and each reader
might reenter the site differently, building upon what each had already
seen (one reader told me that it took her four hours to go through the
site), but it would have involved too many demands upon the Times server.
I had wanted to engage the subjects point of view as a prime navigational
metaphor, so that if a reader clicked on a picture of a Muslim woman unbeknownst
to him he would later on be prohibited from selecting pictures of Serbs,
perhaps rejected from some of the Serbian enclaves represented on the
Web, as happened to the inhabitants of Sarajevo who were continually being
circumscribed by their own ethnicity.There were problems setting up computer
access in Sarajevo - a new medium, it was not a priority for many in Sarajevo,
and the discussion groups were largely dominated by pro-Serbian commentators
living in the US who felt vilified by the conventional media. Also, the
complexity of experiences available to the reader through the photography
was not nearly as great as we had initially wanted, but then again we
had to weigh that against the fact that this site was already much more
complex than almost any photojournalistic foray ever attempted in any
medium.
1.
Many others contributed in important ways to this project, most especially
Times forum moderator and senior editor Bernard Gwertzman, design director
Ron Louie, content development editor Elizabeth Osder and online news
editor Jean-Claude Bouis who did the audio interviews, international forum
producer Alison Cornyn (IBM helped installing computer terminals in the
Hague and the UN), and Indigo Information Design's Lucy Kneebone, Melissa
Tardiff and Amnon Dekel--the latter's early input was essential to the
interactive design.
|
|